|
 |
|
COMMITTEES |
|
|
|
|

|
Armed Services |
|
|
WASHINGTON,
DC 20510-1305 |
GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS |
|
|
SMALL BUSINESS |
|
|
INTELLIGIENCE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November
29, 2005 |
|
|
|
To: Mr. James O'Donnell:
MI
Dear Mr. O'Donnell:
Thank you for contacting me regarding H-IB highly
skilled-worker visas T
appreciate hearing your views on this matter.
Since the technology boom of the 1990s, H-1 B visas have
been the subject of intense
debate. Proponents of H-1B visas argue that the number of skilled-worker
visas issued must be maintained if the United States is to remain
globally competitive and so that employers can remain free to hire the
best people for jobs, regardless of their national origin. However,
those opposing any further increases, temporary or permanent, assert
that there is no evidence of a labor shortage in these professional
areas that cannot be met by newly graduating students or by retraining
the existing U.S. workforce. Congress continues to strive to balance
these two competing approaches.
H-IB visas allow workers from other countries with
special occupational skills to
work in the U.S. for up to six years under the sponsorship of an
American employer. A
company seeking an H-IB visa must attest to the fact that there are no
willing American
workers who can fill the position. In addition, the employer is required
to pay the
nonimmigrant the greater of the prevailing wage for the position or the
actual wages paid to employees in the same position. Under current law,
the maximum number of H-1 B visas is 65,000 in a fiscal year (FY).
As you may know, the N Y 2006 Senate Reconciliation
Spending Bill (5.1932)
included a provision to recapture 30,000 H-1B visas per year that have
been left unused
between FY 1992-FY2003. A $500 fee will be added for each visa used from
this group.
Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV) introduced an amendment that would have
stripped the H-IB visa provision from S.1932 and would have increased
the fee for L-1 visas to $1500. This amendment, which I opposed, failed
by a vote of 14-85. 1 voted against this amendment because I believe it
is important to have an adequate number of visas available to help
ensure the competitiveness of U.S. industry, while making sure that
every effort is made to ensure that American workers are not displaced.
The Senate passed its version of the reconciliation spending bill on
November 3, 2005. This bill now awaits a House-Senate Conference
Committee to work out the differences between the Senate and
House-passed versions of the bill.
Thanks again for writing.

CL:ep
|